Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Alex Knaff vs Nathan Ponwith Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Knaff vs Ponwith analysis and find out who is favored!
Alex Knaff vs Nathan Ponwith Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Knaff 1 - 0 Ponwith
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Knaff has won 48.82% of points on their second serve, while Ponwith has won 50.68%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Knaff, in recent form, has won 50.85% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ponwith has won 50.39%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.84% and 31.93% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Knaff has saved 62.04% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ponwith has saved 55.49% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Knaff has won 60.49% of matches played (W/L 49/ 32), with Ponwith winning 30.77% (W/L 16/ 36) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Knaff has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 38/ 20), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 59/ 48). Ponwith has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 38/ 27), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Knaff has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 61.64% of matches (W/L 45/ 28), where as Ponwith has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 20% of matches (W/L 6/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Knaff winning 1 times and Ponwith being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Knaff winning 2 and Ponwith winning 0. The last match between Knaff and Ponwith was at the Glasgow Challenger, 11-02-2024, Q1 round, I.hard with Alex Knaff getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:16:52.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Knaff and Ponwith have played a deciding set 0 times, with Knaff winning 0 times and Ponwith 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Knaff winning 0, and Ponwith 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Knaff has played against opponents with an average rank of 157.65 while Ponwith has played against players with an average rank of 180.37.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Knaff has won 37% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ponwith has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Knaff has converted 49.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ponwith has converted 41.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
538
Rank
486
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
752
Rank
367
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
60% (174-117)
Career Total W/L
56% (170-136)
52% (15-14)
YTD W/L
44% (11-14)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Alex Knaff | Nathan Ponwith |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:16:52 | 1:16:52 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (27/49) | 66% (41/62) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 89% (24/27) | 56% (23/41) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (13/22) | 52% (11/21) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/2) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (28/62) | 24% (12/49) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Alex Knaff
Player
Nathan Ponwith
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Alex Knaff | Nathan Ponwith |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (15/14) | 44% (11/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (37/31) | 43% (24/32) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (326/295) | 47% (246/276) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 57% (12/9) | 50% (9/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 40% (2/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.33 | 0.24 |
| Aces Total | 99 | 60 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.38 |
| DFs Total | 80 | 98 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:17 | 1:48:50 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 252.38 | 222.48 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1120/1823) | 57% (985/1719) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (783/1120) | 65% (637/985) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (337/703) | 51% (372/734) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (90/184) | 41% (62/150) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (765/1843) | 39% (647/1658) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 29% (2/5) |
| Futures W/L | 52% (13/12) | 50% (9/9) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (15/29) | 44% (11/25) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/7) | 71% (5/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 30% (3/10) | 67% (4/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 76% (17/13) | 82% (11/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 24% (17/4) | 18% (11/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (12/2) | 14% (14/2) |
Alex Knaff Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Alex Knaff
71%
(
66 of
93)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
36 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
73)
82
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alex Knaff
Player
Jacob Brumm
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex Knaff
Player
Adit Sinha
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
41 of
82)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Knaff
Player
Benjamin Thomas George
62%
(
61 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
8
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
45%
(
44 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
81)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Alex Knaff
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
65%
(
24 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Alex Knaff
77%
(
57 of
74)
1st Serve %
75%
(
56 of
75)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eliakim Coulibaly
Player
Alex Knaff
64%
(
87 of
136)
1st Serve %
60%
(
77 of
128)
6
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
6
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
53 of
77)
53%
(
26 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
38%
(
52 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
52 of
128)
136
Total Points Won
128
|
7-6(6) 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex Knaff
Player
Grigory Shebekin
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Knaff
Player
Menelaos Efstathiou
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Alex Knaff
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
7
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-0 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Nathan Ponwith Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Nathan Ponwith
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Collin Altamirano
57%
(
58 of
101)
1st Serve %
59%
(
52 of
88)
4
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
1
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
48%
(
48 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Harsh Parikh
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bruno Kuzuhara
Player
Nathan Ponwith
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Aidan Mchugh
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Maxwell Benson
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
8 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arvid Nordquist
Player
Nathan Ponwith
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudy Quan
Player
Nathan Ponwith
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
6
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Nathan Ponwith
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
9
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Nick Chappell
60%
(
61 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Knaff Vs Ponwith Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
